USPTO serial 74458361
TEAM ARCHITECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCINI, CYNTHIA H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEAM ARCHITECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Satorius
DANIEL M SATORIUSLEONARD, ST AND DEINARD150 S FIFTH ST STE 2300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software and multi-media electronic programs for use by individuals and businesses to evaluate and improve job performance, career skills and career development | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | printed educational materials for use by individuals and businesses to evaluate and improve job performance, career skills and career development | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lominger Limited, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lominger Limited, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named TEAM ARCHITECT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 14, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |