USPTO serial 74458380
HOT BODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOT BODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Pandiscio
MARK J PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO470 TOTTEN POND RDWALTHAM, MA 02154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely thermal underwear | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |