USPTO serial 74459274
FIBERPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIBERPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | devices, units and assemblies for the data, communication and information transmission; modems and fiber optic cables; measuring, test, control, protection devices, namely surge protectors, over current protectors, and over voltage protectors and parts thereof; distributor and connector devices for light waveguides, namely removable and/or stationary connector devices and/or partitioning devices, namely couplers, splitters; connector devices for light waveguides with opto-electrical components; connector devices for light waveguides with opaque design elements, combinations of light-conduction and opaque materials; termination devices and quick-terminate devices for light waveguides, termination devices of light waveguides to an optical network; light waveguides with light-amplifying properties, amplifier devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 13, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |