USPTO serial 74459304
UT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond C. Stewart
RAYMOND C STEWART BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH AND BIRCHP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications switches; pulse code modulation multiplexers and higher order multiplexers; digital transmitters, receivers and transceivers; cryptographic units; telephone sets, facsimile terminals, videotex and telex machines, modems, fire and pollution detectors; radiotelephones, radio base stations; switching stations, namely, local or transit telephone switching base units; digital cross connect switching stations, namely, devices installed in digital transmission systems for performing automatic restoration switching using facility rerouting; identification of friend or foe machines, namely, machines for land, sea or airborne application able to meet identification requirements of long and short range radar systems; avionic machines, namely, airborne terminals for performing radio communications in the nature of data and voice transmission; private digital branch exchanges, namely, private telephone switching units capable of switching a predetermined number of external lines to a predetermined number of extensions; plant safety controllers, namely, machines for monitoring the correct operation of all technical devices in a building including anti-fire devices, and lifting devices; automatic vehicle monitoring apparatus, namely, apparatus for centralized collection of information concerning the location of a single vehicle in a public transportation system as well as the number of passengers transported by a predetermined vehicle; (base transceiver stations (BTS's), local switching center (LSC), main switching center (MSC), location registers (LS), and operation and maintenance centers (OMC), for switching, control and management of cellular and digital cordless telephones; and apparatus in the nature of a video signal broadcasting station, interactive terminals, namely, machines suitable for capturing the data superimposed on video signals and to display them on a television screen, data processing centers for interactive like television systems, and apparatus in the nature of audio video servers, broadband switching centers and set top terminals for interactive television through existing broadcast communications systems enabling the user to participate actively in television programs such as quiz shows, commercials, opinion polls, sports events, and telemarketing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 1, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |