USPTO serial 74459401
GAME OVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLUE, RACHEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GAME OVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Springfield Gardens, NY
Springfield Gardens, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Begler
JAY H BEGLER LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY & BEGLER41 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | breakfast cereals, bubble gum, candy, cereal derived food bars (ready to eat), cereals (breakfast), cereals (processed), chewing gum, chips (chocolate), chips (corn), chips (flour-based), chips (taco), chips (tortilla), chocolate, coffee, cookies, corn chips, crackers, frozen yogurt, ice cream, pasta, snack bars (granola-based), snack foods (cereal based); snack foods (rice based), snack foods (wheat based), snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped corn, snacks (candied fruit), tea, cocoa, sugar, breads, pastries, confectionery items, namely coffee, tea, coca, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago artificial coffee; flour, and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard, vinegar, sauces (except salad dressings), spices; ice; pudding | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 30, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |