Drawing for SECONDARY MARKET GUIDE

USPTO serial 74460641

SECONDARY MARKET GUIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCNUTT, GEOFF
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECONDARY MARKET GUIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles R. Rust

CHARLES R RUST WOODLING, KROST & RUSTSTE 15201801 E NINTH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016reference directoryABANDONEDSep 9, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 3, 1998PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Nov 14, 1997PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 17, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 7, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 12, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 2, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 13, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 1994IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 14, 1994AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 17, 1994IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 17, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance