USPTO serial 74460641
SECONDARY MARKET GUIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCNUTT, GEOFF
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECONDARY MARKET GUIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles R. Rust
CHARLES R RUST WOODLING, KROST & RUSTSTE 15201801 E NINTH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | reference directory | ABANDONED | Sep 9, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 17, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |