USPTO serial 74460947
ELEESE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELEESE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PCBOX 9005676 RIVERDALE AVERIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-0900Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bleaching salts, bleaching soda, blueing, glaze, starch, wax and detergents, all for laundry use; oil for cleaning purposes, scouring powder, polishing cream, abrasive powder for cleaning purposes; beauty masks, greases for cosmetic purposes; cosmetics; namely, essential oils for personal use, perfumes, toilet water, dusting powder, talcum powder, cologne, skin cleansing milk, face creams, face make-up, make-up removers, face powder, cold cream, nail polish, nail-polish removers, blusher, lipstick, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, dentifrices, hand, facial and bath soaps | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |