USPTO serial 74460961
DIGITAL LITIGATION SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIGITAL LITIGATION SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew P. Bridges
ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware for use in legal and business applications, and computer software, namely database, control, imaging, and image handling programs and applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | business consultation, courtroom presentation and litigation support services provided to the legal industry and business community | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | video production and post production, live action, graphics and animation production services, and television programming | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | legal consultation and trial strategy provided to the legal industry and business community | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Litigation Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Litigation Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIGITAL LITIGATION SOLUTIONS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |