Drawing for SWISS MILITARY

USPTO serial 74461397

SWISS MILITARY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWISS MILITARY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joy J. Kaplan

JOY J KAPLAN FISH & NEAVE1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014watchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 21, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 21, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 12, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 19, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 26, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 9, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 9, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 1996LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
May 9, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 11, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance