Drawing for REFRACTIVE CORNEAPLASTY

USPTO serial 74461491

REFRACTIVE CORNEAPLASTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REFRACTIVE CORNEAPLASTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Nataupsky

STEVEN J NATAUPSKY KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of deficient visionABANDONED—
042medical services; namely, correction of deficient visionABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 7, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 7, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 20, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 8, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 10, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 10, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 12, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance