USPTO serial 74461874
FRESH N'DELICIOUS DIET TO GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRESH N'DELICIOUS DIET TO GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victor M. Wigman
VICTOR M WIGMAN WIMAN, COHEN, LEITNER & MYERS, PCSTE 2001735 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | food delivery services; namely, providing packaged meals that are nutritionally balanced and low in sodium for use in diet programs | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | food preparation services; namely, packaged meals that are nutritionally balanced and low in sodium for use in diet programs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by New Century Food Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by New Century Food Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FRESH N'DELICIOUS DIET TO GO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 20, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 4, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |