Drawing for BON SANTE

USPTO serial 74462241

BON SANTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PESKA, KEVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BON SANTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Slavin

MICHAEL A SLAVIN MCHALE & SLAVIN, PA2855 PGA BLVDPALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electric food processorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 1998ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Aug 19, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 15, 1995CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 22, 1995SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 3, 1995IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 27, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 2, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance