USPTO serial 74462243
MADE IN FRANCE FOR YOU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MADE IN FRANCE FOR YOU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonard J. Lev
LEONARD J LEV LIDDY SULLIVAN GALWAY BEGLER & PEROFF710 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes and colognes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 1997 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 24, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 1, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |