USPTO serial 74462283
MADRIGAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 1997
- Examiner
- COHEN, DARREN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MADRIGAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
CLAUDEL ROUSTANG GALAC Societe Anonyme
Paris, FR
Other trademarks owned by CLAUDEL ROUSTANG GALAC Societe Anonyme
CLAUDEL ROUSTANG GALAC Societe Anonyme
75015 Paris, FR
Other trademarks owned by CLAUDEL ROUSTANG GALAC Societe Anonyme
CLAUDEL ROUSTANG GALAC Societe Anonyme
75015 Paris, FR
Other trademarks owned by CLAUDEL ROUSTANG GALAC Societe Anonyme
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jesse A. Salen
Jesse A. Salen Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200San Diego, CA 92130-2006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | cheeses and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLAUDEL ROUSTANG GALAC Societe Anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by CLAUDEL ROUSTANG GALAC Societe Anonyme
- Other trademarks owned by CLAUDEL ROUSTANG GALAC Societe Anonyme
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named MADRIGAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 4, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 17, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 7, 1996 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 13, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |