USPTO serial 74462524
LAUREL AND HARDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVY, MICHAEL S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAUREL AND HARDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | calendars; comic books; coloring books; gift wrapping paper; note cards; art prints; lithographic prints | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | frankfurters; luncheon meats; potato chips; jams; jellies; peanut butter; frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | frozen confections; candy; chewing gum; cakes; pies; cookies; popped popcorn; bread; corn chips; pudding; frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | fruit juices; fruit drinks; carbonated soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of cartoon segments in television programs and live performances by costumed characters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Larry Harmon Pictures Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Larry Harmon Pictures Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LAUREL AND HARDY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 29, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |