USPTO serial 74462817
MODIFIER COIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MODIFIER COIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M5W 1G5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIMOTHY H HIEBERT
TIMOTHY H HIEBERT SAMUELS GAUTHIER STEVENS & REPPERT225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | strontium-aluminum alloys of various forms and chemistries which are used as an alloying agent in aluminum alloys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |