USPTO serial 74463271
HUBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICARDO, RANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HUBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D - 8434 Berching, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George M. Thomas
GEORGE M THOMAS HOPKINS & THOMAS100 GALLERIA PKWY NW STE 1550ATLANTA, GA 30339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | machines for mechanical purification of sewage, particularly fine rakes, fine sieves, sand traps, presses for rakings; fitted parts for the water-supply for equipping of shafts, elevated tanks and of installations for the treatment of water, particularly shaft covers, ventilating shafts, shaft ladders, doors, venetian blinds, input and removal pipes, fitting and extending parts, railings, platforms, landings, stairs, consoles; fitted parts and equipping parts for the field of waste disposal in the municipal as well as in the industrial sector, particularly for sewage plants, particularly channels, flaps, slides, rakes, cleaners of installations for holding back fat; equipping parts for passive protection of property, particularly doors, windows, venetian blinds, switchgear; fitted parts, particularly containers and weldments, for food processing factories, for bridge and road constructions as well as for filling stations and service areas, all goods mentioned before in essential parts of high-grade steel | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |