USPTO serial 74463452
NITTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NITTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM L. ANDROLIA
WILLIAM L ANDROLIA KODA AND ANDROLIA10100 SANTA MONICA BLVDSTE 2340LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | automatic screw fastening machines, automatic screw driving machines, automatic nut fastening machines, automatic riveting machines, automatic eyeletting machines, automatic pin inserting machines, and assembly robots | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |