Drawing for AIVIA

USPTO serial 74463685

AIVIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIVIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Superfine

RICHARD J SUPERFINE HAMMAN & BENN25 E WASHINGTON ST STE 600CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer equipment; namely, general purpose computers and scanning devices, for information management through combining imaging and data technologies, and for related software, and for instructional manuals sold together as a unit, and computer programs; namely, software for use in training using voice, pictures and text on computers or computer terminalsABANDONED—
037maintenance and repair in the field of computer equipment which combines images and dataABANDONED—
042software support services; namely, phone consultation, providing update services, electronic bulletin boards and de-buggingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 1996EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 1996EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 4, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 17, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 31, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 8, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 27, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance