Drawing for BEAUTE INSTANTANEE

USPTO serial 74463785

BEAUTE INSTANTANEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2327474Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 14, 2000
Examiner
BUTLER, CHERYL A
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BEAUTE INSTANTANEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

Mark I. Peroff, Esq. Hiscock & Barclay, LLPSeven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003creams and lotions for the body, namely creams and lotions for face careSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2010CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Feb 26, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2006C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 1, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Apr 26, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 13, 2006815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 13, 2006E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2000COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Sep 22, 2000AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Mar 14, 2000R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 21, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 27, 19991.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
May 5, 1999PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Aug 19, 1998PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 7, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 29, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 25, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 1996IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Mar 19, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 26, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 18, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance