USPTO serial 74463976
RANDALLS FOOD & PHARMACY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2001
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with RANDALLS FOOD & PHARMACY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX
HOUSTON, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GIGI REMINGTON
Gigi Remington SAFEWAY INC.11555 Dublin Canyon RdLegal DepartmentPLEASANTON, CA 94588Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail grocery store and supermarket services | ACTIVE | Jul 28, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Randall's Food & Drugs, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RANDALL'S FOOD & DRUGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RANDALL'S FOOD & DRUGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RANDALL'S FOOD & DRUGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RANDALL'S FOOD & DRUGS, LP
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RANDALLS FOOD & PHARMACY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 27, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 1996 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |