USPTO serial 74464118
THE BEST BEER IN AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BEST BEER IN AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ETHAN HORWITZ
ETHAN HORWITZ DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beverages; namely, beer and ale | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 6, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |