USPTO serial 74464625
MICROPARTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICROPARTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert Dubno
HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900RIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-0900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | miniature general purpose machines and parts thereof, namely gearwheels, gears, levers and nozzles; filters, valves and switches for machines of all types; channeled plates for conducting fluids | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electric and electronic components, miniature, subminiature and microstructure circuitry and parts thereof, namely coils, electric switches and plugs, acceleration sensors; telecommunication receivers, transmitters, repeaters and interfaces; optical apparatus, namely optical fibers, optical fiber connectors and couplers, optical fiber splicers, optical fiber plugs, optical fiber network couplers | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | medical instruments and apparatus, namely miniature, subminiature and microstructure medication dosers, dispensers, administrators, pulverizers and vaporizers; surgical instruments for cutting, holding and treating tissue; and catheters for all purposes and endoscopes and microstructure parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICROPARTS GESELLSCHAFT FUR MIKROSTRUKTURTECHNIK MBH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named MICROPARTS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |