Drawing for BAG BUDDY

USPTO serial 74464639

BAG BUDDY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAG BUDDY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WENDY K BUSKOP

WENDY K BUSKOP Buskop Law GroupP.O. Box 540008HOUSTON, TX 77254UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009anti-intrusion, anti-theft alarms for sport and athletic bags, including golf bags, bowling bags, boxing bags, lacrosse bags, ski boot bags, sportsman bags, fishing bags, hunter bags, gym bags; luggage and travel bags, including carry-on bags, duffel bags, overnight bags, suitcases; handbags, including purses, clutch bags, shoulder bags, evening bags, tote bags; book bags; ammunition bags; shopping bags; briefcases; attaches; tool boxesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 15, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 30, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 2, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 13, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance