USPTO serial 74464911
DAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles A. Muserlian
CHARLES A MUSERLIAN BIERMAN AND MUSERLIAN600 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | membrane electrolyzers for the production of caustic soda and for electrolysis of non-chlorine sodium salts comprised of porous, catalytic, flexible electrodes and porous, rigid current collectors, sold as a unit | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |