USPTO serial 74464945
BUSINESS & PLEASURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUSINESS & PLEASURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester Rushin III
LESTER RUSHIN III GTE SERVICE CORPORATIONONE STAMFORD FORUMSTAMFORD, CT 06904UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the sale of telecommunication services through the administration of incentive award programs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |