USPTO serial 74465308
ELECTUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELECTUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George M. Reyes
GEORGE M REYES BEST, BEST & KRIEGER400 MISSION SQ 3750 UNIVERSITY AVEPOST OFFICE BOX 1028RIVERSIDE, CA 92502-1028Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | hospital based information systems consisting of patient and personnel scheduling software for health care facilities, patient billing software programs for health care facilities, patient personal and medical information software for health care facilities | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | medical products, namely radiation therapy equipment consisting of ionization chambers for patient radiation therapy and/or treatment, detector electronic equipment for radiation dose, intensity, position, distribution and uniformity for patient radiation therapy and/or treatment, proton beam treatment systems consisting of proton beam accelerators, proton beam transport, 360-degree proton beam gantry, proton beam delivery nozzle, patient handling devices, patient immobilization devices, proton beam control device, and safety control devices; diagnostic detector software for radiation therapy in health care facilities used as a component with diagnostic tools | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | product development, engineering maintenance and consulting services in the field of healthcare | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ELECTUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 12, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 19, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |