USPTO serial 74466526
ROBERT ROTHSCHILD FARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 1997
- Examiner
- GRUNDY, JUDITH A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROBERT ROTHSCHILD FARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
URBANA, CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, OH
Urbana, OH
Urbana, OH
URBANA, CHAMPAIGN COUNTY, OH
Urbana, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R. MENKER
JAMES R MENKER PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPPO BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22102-8500UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fruit and berry preserves, berry puree, olive oil, sun dried tomatoes, bottled raspberries in liqueur, fruit and berry sauces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | berry syrups, fruit and berry chutney, salsa, mustard, barbecue sauce, horseradish sauce, fruit and balsamic vinegars, herb vinegars and salad dressings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RRF ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHSCHILD BERRY FARM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHSCHILD BERRY FARM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RRF ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ROTHSCHILD BERRY FARM, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ROBERT ROTHSCHILD FARM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2003 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 7, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |