USPTO serial 74466701
TEKWAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEKWAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Universal City, CA
Universal City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl M. Friedman
CHERYL M FRIEDMAN100 UNIVERSAL CITY PLZUNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | antennas, telephone answering machines, prerecorded audio cassettes, prerecorded video cassettes, prerecorded audio tapes, prerecorded video tapes, compact disc all featuring music, phonographs featuring music, batteries, magnets, cameras, video cameras, video tape recorders, camera cases, contact lens cases, eyeglass cases, eyeglass chains, eyeglass frames, eyeglasses, sunglasses, dog whistles, signal whistles, juke boxes, kaleidoscopes, electric kettles, electric hair curlers, pedometers, radios, telephones, telescopes, televisions, thermostats, tripods for cameras and vacuum cleaners | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1996 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Mar 8, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |