USPTO serial 74467765
BEEF NUGGETS PET VALU DOG TREATS DELICES POUR CHIENS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRUEHLING, EVERETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEEF NUGGETS PET VALU DOG TREATS DELICES POUR CHIENS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, L3R 9Z6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARNE I. FORS
JAY K. MEADWAY Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, L.L.C.Two Liberty Place, 50 South 16th Street22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | pet food | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |