USPTO serial 74468618
SOUND BLASTER OFFICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOUND BLASTER OFFICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Steiner
MARK A STEINER TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW8TH FLTWO EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software, computer peripherals and user reference manual therefore sold as a unit, stereo quality computer audio printed circuit board containing integrated circuits featuring (i) recording and playback of sound files, (ii) FM (Frequency Modulation) synthesizer, (iii) microphone, stereo line-in and CD (Computer Disc) interfaces, (iv) MIDI (Musical Instruments Digital Interface) interface, and (v) stereo amplifier and mixer; CD-ROM (Read Only Memory) drive; stereo headphones; and computer operating software sold in kit form with computer software business application programs, namely for word processing; for producing financial and accounting spreadsheets; for producing charts and graphs; for data base management; for linking and embedding sound files; for controlling a personal computer with speech commands; for editing, manipulating, recording and mixing sound files; for synthesizing sound from text files; and for scheduling appointments and reminders | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 29, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |