Drawing for INTELLIGENT TAG

USPTO serial 74469246

INTELLIGENT TAG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIFMAN, ARI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIGENT TAG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel J. Long

DANIEL J LONGP O BOX 1185PITTSBURGH, PA 15230-1185UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009infrared transmitters for an electronically locating and transmitting system using infrared receivers, arbitrators transmitters, identifiers and a central processing unit, namely a computerABANDONEDNov 12, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 18, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 22, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 26, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 19, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 20, 1995JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 20, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 27, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance