USPTO serial 74469667
ALPHA RETAIL TRADING A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALPHA RETAIL TRADING A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bettina Elias
BETTINA ELIAS SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM919 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | airport retail store featuring newspapers, magazines, candy, snacks, liquor, tobacco products, perfume and various gift items | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALPHA FLIGHT SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Forte Airport Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ALPHA FLIGHT SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ALPHA RETAIL TRADING A
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |