USPTO serial 74470047
WIRED INTERACTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIRED INTERACTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet L. Cullum
JANET L CULLUM COOLEY GODWARD CASTRO HUDDLESON & TATUMFIVE PALO ALTO SQ 4TH FLPALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | transmission of messages and data about the digital revolution via access to an interactive computer | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WIRED VENTURES, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by WIRED VENTURES, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by WIRED HOLDING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named WIRED INTERACTIVE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |