USPTO serial 74472955
PECORA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PECORA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Societe Anonyme Des Caves et Des Producteurs Reunis de Roquefort
12250 Roquefort sur Soulzon, FR
Other trademarks owned by Societe Anonyme Des Caves et Des Producteurs Reunis de Roquefort
Societe Anonyme Des Caves et Des Producteurs Reunis de Roquefort
12250 Roquefort sur Soulzon, FR
Other trademarks owned by Societe Anonyme Des Caves et Des Producteurs Reunis de Roquefort
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. John Campaign
H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | cheese, dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Societe Anonyme Des Caves et Des Producteurs Reunis de Roquefort
- Other trademarks owned by Societe Anonyme Des Caves et Des Producteurs Reunis de Roquefort
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named PECORA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 1994 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |