USPTO serial 74473647
NO LIMIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NO LIMIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric H. Weimers
ERIC H WEIMERS JENNER & BLOCKONE IBM PLZCHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | snowboards, skateboards, and snowboarding and skateboarding accessories, namely snowboard bags, snowboard goggles, snowboard tool kits, snowboard boots, snowboard bindings and parts therefor, snowboard vise adapter sets, snowboard wax, snowboard scrapers, snowboard files, skateboard decks, skateboard wheels, skateboard bearings, skateboard trucks, shin guards, arm guards, hand guards, knuckle guards, elbow guards, wrist guards, ankle guards, knee guards, and thigh guards | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |