Drawing for AIVIA

USPTO serial 74474283

AIVIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIVIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Superfine

RICHARD J SUPERFINE HAMMAN & BENN25 E WASHINGTON ST STE 600CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer equipment; namely, general purpose computers and scanning devices, for information management through combining imaging and data technologies, and for related software, and for instructional manuals sold together as a unit, and computer programs; namely, software for use in training using voice, pictures and text on computers or computer terminalsABANDONED—
037maintenance and repair in the field of computer equipment which combines images and dataABANDONED—
042software support services, namely phone consultation, providing update services, electronic bulletin boards and de-buggingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 15, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 13, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 17, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 24, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 31, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 27, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance