USPTO serial 74474639
REPELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 1995
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REPELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Columbus, OH
PASIG CITY, PH
PLEKO SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
TACOMA, WA
Columbus, OH
TAJ MP MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
MANDALUYONG CITY, PH
Other trademarks owned by TAJ MP MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Columbus, OH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | silicone-based finish/coating for synthetic stucco used in the construction industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pleko Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SINAG TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by PLEKO SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Pleko Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TAJ MP MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Pleko Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named REPELL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2001 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |