USPTO serial 74474836
EPISODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPISODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toppy Company (Hong Kong) Limited
Kwai Chung, New Territories, HK
Toppy Company (Hong Kong) Limited
Kwai Chung, New Territories, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs
HEIDI L SACHS PERKINS COIE1201 THIRD AVE 40TH FLSEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, namely almond milk for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic body creams, eyebrow, eye and face make-up, beauty masks, make-up remover, nail polish, nail varnish, lipstick and face powder; cosmetic kits consisting of eye make-up, eyebrow make-up, lipstick and face powders; body, bath, baby and massage oils; hair lotions, namely hair conditioners, hair shampoo and hair gels; deodorant soap, saddle soap, skin soap and toilet soap; perfumes; essential oils for personal use, perfumed body lotion; toiletries, namely shaving gel, shaving cream, toothpaste and bath powder | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |