USPTO serial 74476111
AIRCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Unionville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Murray Schaffer
MURRAY SCHAFFER MESSRS. BAUER & SCHAFFER114 OLD COUNTRY RDMINEOLA, NY 11501-4477UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | preparation for shielding polytetrafluoroethylene additives, which additives are used as a component to dust reducers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |