Drawing for JESUS 2000

USPTO serial 74476382

JESUS 2000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JESUS 2000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Markva

NEIL F MARKVA8322A TRAFORD LNSPRINGFIELD, VA 22152UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041organizing and conducting entertainment events in the nature of congresses, conventions, conferences, concerts, plays, exhibitions, crafts, personal performances, praise and worship services, and biblical re-enactments, all in celebration of JesusABANDONED—
200indicating membership in an association of individuals and organizations working together to exalt the name of Jesus throughout the worldABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 7, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 18, 1997PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Oct 17, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 1997PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 5, 1997EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 20, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 16, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 21, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 19, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance