Drawing for PACKET ENGINES

USPTO serial 74476641

PACKET ENGINES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACKET ENGINES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID H JAFFER

DAVID H JAFFER ROSENBLUM PARISH & ISAACSFIFTEENTH FL160 W SANTA CLARA STSAN JOSE, CA 95113

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and computer programs for data communications, storage, and image applicationsACTIVENov 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 27, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 27, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 27, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 4, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 5, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 13, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 15, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 25, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 4, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 14, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 14, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1996IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 31, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 31, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 15, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance