USPTO serial 74476641
PACKET ENGINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PACKET ENGINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H JAFFER
DAVID H JAFFER ROSENBLUM PARISH & ISAACSFIFTEENTH FL160 W SANTA CLARA STSAN JOSE, CA 95113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and computer programs for data communications, storage, and image applications | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 4, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 31, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |