USPTO serial 74476927
KANGOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUNG, SARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KANGOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cumbria CA23 3DJ, GB
Cumbria CA23 3DJ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. PATCH
DANA M RAYMOND BAKER & BOTTS, LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ 44TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10112-0228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | body soap, skin soap, deodorant soap; cosmetics, namely deodorants, deodorant body sprays, lipsticks, skin cleansing preparations, skin toning preparations, skin moisturizing preparations, face powders, face creams, aftershave lotion, aftershave cream, body lotion, shampoo, talcum powder, shower gel, bath foam; essential oils for personal use; perfume; hair lotion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 4, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |