USPTO serial 74477891
MOOSE RACING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOOSE RACING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Marsh
THOMAS R MARSH SHERIDAN ROSS & MCINTOSH1700 LINCOLN ST STE 3500DENVER, CO 80203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | motorcycle parts and motorcycle hardware, namely, handle bars, hand guards, chains, tire tubes, chain guides, disc rotors for brakes, muffler packing, chain block, chain rollers, side-stands, shift levers, skid plates, fender braces, clutch plates, block spacers, vent hose spinners, drain plugs, bike stands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 24, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 1995 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 1995 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |