Drawing for ULTRA-FLEX

USPTO serial 74478035

ULTRA-FLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA-FLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric R. Perkins

ERIC R PERKINS NICOLETTE & PERKINS555 KINDERKAMACK RDORADELL, NJ 07649UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011HVAC damper systems, consisting of heating and air conditioning zone dampersABANDONEDJul 21, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 16, 1996ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 9, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 7, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 20, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 4, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 17, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 28, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance