Drawing for BONE BUILDER

USPTO serial 74478632

BONE BUILDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BONE BUILDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grant R. Clayton

GRANT R CLAYTONTHORPE N & WESTERN9035 S 700 E STE 200SANDY, UT 84070

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005nutritional supplements, namely microcystalline hydroxyapatite containing dietary supplementsABANDONEDMar 13, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 1998PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 29, 1998PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 12, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 23, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 15, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 5, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 9, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance