USPTO serial 74478767
UNITHANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNITHANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-92800 PUTEAUX, FR
F-92800 PUTEAUX, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. William Millen
I WILLIAM MILLEN MILLEN, WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN, PCARLINGTON COURTHOUSE PLZ ONE2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | raw acrylic resins; chemical additives for inks; chemical additives for paints; structuring agents; anti-depositing agents; catalysts; chemical compounds for use in industry; condensation chemical products; chemical products for the preparation of colours; plastic material dispersions; aqueous emulsions of synthetic resins; emulsifiers; raw epoxy resins; floating agents; raw plastic materials; plastisols; raw synthetic resins; urethane polymers; alkyd resins, said goods being used in the naval industry unless otherwise specified | ABANDONED | — |
| 002 | varnishes for wood; protective coatings; colouring matters; diluents for colours; thickeners for colours; binders for colours; printing inks; inks (toners) for photocopying machines; fixatives (varnishes); inks for engraving; printing paste (inks); pigments; wood preservatives; binders for pigments; coatings for wood, said goods being used in the naval industry unless otherwise specified | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 31, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 11, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |