USPTO serial 74479329
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by Clearly Canadian Beverage Corporation
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N. Owen
GREGORY N OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST 19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | aerated water; namely, sparkling water beverage with natural fruit flavour | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 22, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |