USPTO serial 74480232
VERID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Lewis
GEORGE W LEWIS KECK, MAHIN & CATEP O BOX 06110CHICAGO, IL 60606-0110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers; computer software in connection with fingerprint identification, cataloguing and subsequent verification; computer hardware; optical apparatus and instruments used for scanning and recording images onto computer memory; interfaces; for computer hardware; video cameras; prisms for scientific purposes; computer keyboards and keypads; apparatus for encoding and/or decoding visual instruments such as finger prints onto computer memory for subsequent display, recognition and verification; apparatus for verifying and displaying fingerprint images on visual display units; blank computer discs and tapes; pre-recorded computer discs and tapes used in connection with fingerprint identification, parts for all the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |