Drawing for TUB

USPTO serial 74480275

TUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rochelle D. Alpert

ROCHELLE D ALPERT BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP1 MARKET PLZSPEAR ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software and pre-corded CD ROMs featuring specialty directory guides in the fields of health, finance, retirement, advertising, education, food/nutrition, business, entertainment, technology, home/family, environment, sports, communication, shopping, travel, employment, insurance, real estate, legal, investments, children, aging and exerciseABANDONED
042providing general information by means of an on-line database featuring health, finance, retirement, advertising, education, food/nutrition, business entertainment, technology, home/family, environment, sports, communication, shopping, travel, employment, insurance, real estate, legal, investments, children, aging and exerciseABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 20, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 1998EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
May 7, 1998EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 29, 1997EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 18, 1997EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 2, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
May 20, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 29, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 13, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 9, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 20, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 21, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 6, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 19, 1995DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 24, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Mar 10, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 27, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 10, 1995DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Feb 8, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 12, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 20, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance